The plan has no author with expertise in cultural heritage and this is clear in the limited understanding of both the baseline and of the sectoral issues in relation to climate x heritage. While there was consultation I suggest also consulting The Heritage Council formally, which may bring more benefit than an author with little knowledge of the sector selecting Heritage Council material to include. Screening and scoping for this section should be undertaken by an archaeologist specialising in this sector.
A minor point is that the county has been settled for more than 5000 years.
A significant gap is the failure to state that as well as recorded monuments on the RMP there are numerous as yet unrecorded or unknown monuments. This leads into the major and absent key issue - that archaeological sites including those underwater and historic buildings are vulnerable to erosion and degradation, like soils, from changes in climate. Both recorded and unknown sites, as well as artefacts, are often exposed following severe weather events or over time through constant erosion.
It would useful to inform the public though the actions arising out if this plan of this risk and explain how to notify the appropriate bodies if they find heritage sites or materials which have been exposed in this way.
